![]() How would you like to see them integrated? What functionality needs to happen? Hopefully it will jolt the developer’s into action. What I would like to see is not only a vote, but I want posters to imagine that this integration will become a reality. This post is going to be cross-posted in the three forums, along with a poll. To top it off, all of these companies offer excellent support and have very active forums and are easy on the wallet. Its formatting capabilities and aesthetic feel far surpass Endnote and Sente. Bookends is the bibliographic manager to beat. It is a powerful processor for serious academic writers and is only going to get better (unlike Word which has fallen into a hole and doesn’t seem to know it). Mellel has come to be the serious rival to Word, and already surpasses Word in very significant areas. Although there are alot of imitators, no one touches DEVONthink. I believe that these 3 programs are the best in their area. If I had the money, I would pay each of these programmer’s to do this- honestly! But I don’t, and I can only hope that instead the programmer’s will see the potential for making money by working together to form an integrated writer’s suite. I was drooling at the Nota Bene presentation. ![]() #MELLEL ADD CITATION HOTKEY PC#There is nothing of comparison for Mac, and I hate being jealous of a PC user. I recently met Mac users at a conference who are going to run Parallels specifically to use Nota Bene, and I don’t blame them. Mac needs an equivalent to PC’s Nota Bene. We need a powerful integrated package to do our research and writing. This has been a constant discussion that rears its head on the DT forum, the Mellel forum, and Bookends forum, and this is my latest attempt to get these three companies to work together. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |